You are cordially invited to attend the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and any adjournment, postponement or other delay thereof (the “Annual Meeting”), of Accuray Incorporated, a Delaware corporation (“Accuray” or the “Company”), which will be held virtually via live audio webcast on Thursday, November 9, 2023 at 9:00 a.m. PST. In order to attend and vote at the Annual Meeting, see “How can I attend the Annual Meeting virtually?” in the proxy statement (the “Proxy Statement”) that accompanies this Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

We are holding the Annual Meeting for the following purposes:

These items of business to be transacted at the Annual Meeting are more fully described in the Proxy Statement. The Annual Meeting this year will be a virtual-only meeting of stockholders to provide convenience to our stockholders and enable increased stockholder participation. Stockholders will be able to attend and participate in the Annual Meeting, vote their shares electronically, and submit questions during the live audio webcast of the Annual Meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ARAY2023 and entering their control number.

The Annual Meeting will begin promptly at 9:00 a.m. PST. Only holders of record and beneficial owners of shares of our common stock at the close of business on September 14, 2023, the record date, are entitled to notice of, to attend, and to vote at the Annual Meeting. A list of stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be available by writing to the Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices located at 1240 Deming Way, Madison, WI 53717. The stockholder list will also be available online at the virtual meeting website during the Annual Meeting to those that attend the meeting.

It is important that you use this opportunity to vote on the business to come before the stockholders at the Annual Meeting. After reading the Proxy Statement and Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 (the “Annual Report”), you are urged to cast your vote as promptly as possible. If you are accessing the Proxy Statement and Annual Report using notice and access, you will have received a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, which was mailed on or about the date of this Notice, and should vote by telephone or over the Internet. If you have received your proxy materials by mail, please promptly sign, date and return the enclosed proxy card in the prepaid envelope provided to you or vote by telephone or over the Internet to ensure that your shares are represented at the Annual Meeting. For more information, see “Why did I receive a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials?” in the Proxy Statement.

All stockholders are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting. Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please cast your vote as promptly as possible by telephone, Internet or by signing and dating your proxy card and returning it promptly. This will ensure that your vote will be counted if you later decide not to, or are unable to, attend the Annual Meeting. Even if you have given your proxy, you may still attend and vote at the Annual Meeting.

This proxy statement (“Proxy Statement”) is furnished to our stockholders of record as of the close of business on September 14, 2023 (the “Record Date”), in connection with the solicitation of proxies by our Board of Directors (the “Board”) for use in connection with our 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and any adjournment, postponement or other delay thereof (the “Annual Meeting”), to be held virtually via live audio webcast on Thursday, November 9, 2023, at 9:00 a.m. PST. In order to attend and vote at the Annual Meeting, please follow the instructions in the section titled “Questions and Answers Regarding This Solicitation and Voting at the Annual Meeting—How can I attend the Annual Meeting virtually?” This Proxy Statement and the proxy card are first being made available to our stockholders on or about September 29, 2023. Our Company’s fiscal year ended on June 30, 2023.

Our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation provides that our Board shall be divided into three classes, designated Class I, Class II and Class III, with each class serving for a staggered three-year term. Our Board currently consists of eight directors: three Class I directors, three Class II directors and two Class III directors. At each annual meeting of stockholders, a class of directors will be elected for a three-year term to succeed the same class whose term is then expiring. Proxies cannot be voted for more than three persons.

The following information is provided for each of the nominees and continuing directors: name, class in which each director or nominee serves, age as of August 31, 2023, and length of service on our Board.

Listed below are the biographies of each director nominee and continuing director and the experiences, qualifications, attributes or skills that led the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board (the “Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee”) to recommend, and our Board to determine, that the person should serve as a director for the Company. There are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.

Our Board has nominated Mses. Huss and Nishimura and Dr. Scott for election as Class II directors to serve until our 2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualified. Each nominee for director has consented to being named in this Proxy Statement and has indicated a willingness to serve if elected. If a nominee is unavailable for election, the persons named as proxyholders will use their discretion to vote for any substitute nominee in accordance with their best judgment. Each nominee is an incumbent director currently serving on the Board. Ms. Nishimura and Dr. Scott are standing for election by the stockholders for the first time at the Annual Meeting. All nominees were recommended for approval by our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Ms. Huss and Dr. Scott were originally recommended to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee by an executive recruiting firm and Ms. Nishimura was originally recommended by one of our executive officers at the time.

Beverly A. Huss has served as a member of our Board since January 2018. From January 2021 to July 2022, Ms. Huss served as the Chief Executive Officer of Pagonia Medical, Inc. (“Pagonia”), a private company focused on creating a novel non-invasive device for the preservation of tissue following a heart attack, stroke, traumatic brain injury and other medical conditions. From September 2013 until December 2020, she served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Qool Therapeutics, Inc. (“Qool”), formerly Thermocure, Inc., a private company focused on temperature management therapies. Prior to joining Qool, Ms. Huss was President and Chief Executive Officer at start-up medical device company Vibrynt, Inc., and held multiple senior level leadership positions at Guidant Corporation, a public company that designs and manufactures cardiovascular products, including, most recently President, Endovascular Solutions, Vice President, Global Marketing, Vascular Intervention and Vice President of the Stent Business Unit. Ms. Huss has served on the board of directors of

Vicarious Surgical Inc., a medical robotics company, since October 2022; Iridex Corporation, a public medical device company, since March 2022; and Ancora Heart, Inc., a privately-held medical device company developing heart failure treatments, since June 2021. She also serves on the audit committee of Iridex Corporation and Vicarious Surgical Inc. Her prior private company board experience includes Pagonia, Madorra Inc., Coala Life, Inc., Artes Medical, Inc., Wright Medical Group, Inc., and Dade Behring Holdings, Inc. Ms. Huss holds a M.S. in technology management from Pepperdine University and a B.S. in metallurgical engineering from the University of Illinois.

As a former Chief Executive Officer with more than 25 years of management experience in the medical device industry, and a current and former member of several public and private company boards with two decades of board experience, Ms. Huss brings to our Board extensive experience in the medical device industry, including experience in the areas of business operations, management and corporate governance.

Mika Nishimura has served as a member of our Board since August 2021. Since 2011, Ms. Nishimura has served as an Operational Partner with Gilde Healthcare Partners, a life-science focused venture fund. From 2015 to 2020, Ms. Nishimura served as Vice President of Commercialization at nVision Medical Corporation, an early clinical-stage medical device company acquired by Boston Scientific. Previously, she served as Vice President, Commercial Development at Auxogyn, Inc., a medical technology company, acquired by Progyny, Inc. Earlier in her career, Ms. Nishimura served as Vice President of International Sales Operations and Marketing at ev3 Inc., a provider for specialists treating a wide range of vascular diseases and disorders, where she held P&L responsibilities for the emerging markets. She has also served as a board member of SI-BONE, Inc., a public medical device company dedicated to solving musculoskeletal disorders of the sacropelvic anatomy, since March 2021; a board member of HOYA Corp, a publicly listed Japanese company manufacturing optical products, since June 2022; and as a board advisor to Tristel, plc, a UK public medical technology company, since January 2021. Ms. Nishimura holds an MBA from Harvard Graduate School of Business Administration and a B.A. in Economics from Yale University.

As a leader who has worked with and for various medical device companies, Ms. Nishimura brings to the board extensive leadership experience in the medical device industry, including experience with commercialization.

Byron C. Scott has served as a member of our Board since February 2021. Dr. Scott has served as Adjunct Faculty at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Isenberg School of Management since 2016, Adjunct Faculty at Jefferson University, College of Population Health since December 2019 where he teaches healthcare quality, patient safety, and performance improvement, and Adjunct, Associate Professor at New York University Stern School of Business since January 2023. Dr. Scott served as Deputy Chief Health Officer at IBM Watson Health from March 2017 to June 2020, where he served as a consultant helping healthcare organizations align strategies and improve performance, along with supporting sales, marketing, and thought leadership. Dr. Scott served at Truven Health Analytics., an IBM Watson Health company that provides healthcare analytics, from January 2014 to February 2017, most recently as Associate Chief Medical Officer from 2015 to 2017, prior to its acquisition by International Business Machines Corporation (“IBM”) in 2016. Dr. Scott previously served at EmCare Holdings Inc., a private hospital-based physician practice management company that was part of Envision Healthcare, from 1995 to 2013, where he held positions of increasing responsibility, including most recently as Executive Vice President of the West Division from 2011 to 2013. Dr. Scott is board certified in emergency medicine and previously practiced medicine for over 25 years. He currently serves as a member of the Board of Directors of Providence Health Plan, a privately held health insurance provider, and Direct Relief, a nonprofit humanitarian organization, including Direct Relief Mexico and Direct Relief South Africa. In addition, Dr. Scott also currently serves as Board Trustee, Vice-Chair, Audit and Corporate Responsibility Committee, and member of the Quality, Patient Safety, and Medical Affairs Committee of the Board of Directors at Rady Children’s Hospital & Health Center. Dr. Scott holds a B.S. in Psychobiology from the University of California, Los Angeles, a M.D. from the University of California, San Diego, and a M.B.A. from the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Isenberg School of Management. He is Directorship Certified by the National Association for Corporate Directors (“NACD”) and holds a CERT Cybersecurity Oversight Certification issued by Carnegie Mellon University and NACD. He is also board certified in healthcare quality management.

As a former executive in the healthcare industry and practicing physician, Dr. Scott brings to our Board extensive experience in management, operations and strategy in the healthcare industry, perspective and experience as a physician, and clinical and academic background in healthcare.

Anne B. Le Grand has served as a member of our Board since July 2020. Ms. Le Grand served as a consultant to IBM Watson Health, a machine intelligence company that is a division of IBM, a publicly traded information technology company, from January 2021 to January 2023. Prior to that, Ms. Le Grand also served as Vice President and General Manager of Imaging, Life Sciences, Oncology and Genomics at IBM Watson Health from July 2019 to December 2020 and VP and General Manager of Imaging at IBM Watson Health from April 2016 to July 2019. Prior to her roles at IBM Watson Health, Ms. Le Grand served as Senior Vice President of Healthcare and General Manager of Therapeutics from January 2015 to April 2016 and Senior Vice President of Healthcare Business Transformation from January 2014 to January 2015 at Koninkliike Philips N.V., a health technology company. Ms. Le Grand previously served in various senior leadership positions at GE HealthCare Technologies Inc. and Eastman Kodak Company and began her career at 3M Company in the Medical Imaging Division. Ms. Le Grand has served as a member of the board of directors of Medimaps Group, SA, a private medical analytics software company, since May 2022. Ms. Le Grand holds a B.S. in Chemistry from Queens University of Charlotte.

As a former executive with more than 25 years of experience running global healthcare businesses, Ms. Le Grand brings to our Board extensive experience in the medical device industry, including operations, management and business development, as well as financial acumen.

Robert C. Kill has served as a member of our Board since January 2023. From 2016 to 2022, Mr. Kill served as a board member of Ascension Ventures, a venture capital fund. From 2017 to 2022, Mr. Kill also served as Chief Executive Officer of Parata Systems, LLC (“Parata Systems”), a pharmacy automation technology provider serving hospital, retail, long term care, mail order and government pharmacies. Prior to joining Parata Systems, Mr. Kill was an operating partner of two private equity funds, Frazier Healthcare Partners from 2016 to 2017 and Altamont Capital Partners from 2012 to 2016. Mr. Kill has also served in varying capacities at Cogentix Medical, Inc. (formerly Uroplasty, Inc.), a publicly traded medical device company that manufactured and marketed neuromodulation and endoscopy technologies, from 2010 to 2016, including most recently as its Chairman & Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Kill’s earlier experience includes executive leadership positions with healthcare service and healthcare IT companies. He began his career at Baxter Healthcare and holds a B.A. in Economics from the University of Notre Dame.

As a healthcare technology executive and former Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Kill brings to our Board extensive experience in the healthcare technology and medical device industry, including in the areas of executive leadership, operations and strategy.

Joseph E. Whitters has served as a member of our Board since July 2018. Mr. Whitters has been an advisor/consultant to Frazier Healthcare Partners, a private equity firm, since 2005. From 1986 to 2005, Mr. Whitters served in various capacities with First Health Group Corp., a publicly traded managed care company, most recently as its Chief Financial Officer. He also previously served as the Controller for United Healthcare Corp, a publicly traded health care management company, from 1984 to 1986. Prior to that, Mr. Whitters served as the Manager of Accounting and Taxation for Overland Express, a publicly traded trucking company, and he began his career in public accounting with Peat Marwick (now KPMG). Mr. Whitters has served as a member of the board of directors of Spark Networks SE, an operator of premium online dating sites and mobile applications, since July 2021. Mr. Whitters has also served on the boards of directors and audit committees of various public companies, including InfuSystem Holdings, Inc., a provider of infusion pumps and related products and services, from April 2012 through May 2019; Analogic Corporation, a healthcare and security technology solutions company, from October 2017 through June 2018; PRGX Global, Inc., a provider of recovery audit and spend analytics services, from February 2013 to March 2021; Cutera, Inc., a global aesthetics device company, from February 2019 through June 2023; and Air Methods Corp., an air medical transportation and air tourism company, from March 2016 through April 2017. Mr. Whitters has also been an advisor or board member of several private companies. Mr. Whitters holds a B.A. in Accounting from Luther College.

As a former Chief Financial Officer with significant public company governance experience in the medical technology and medical device industry, Mr. Whitters brings to our Board extensive experience in finance, accounting, public company governance, operations and strategy.

James M. Hindman has served as a member of our Board since September 2019. Mr. Hindman served in various positions at Allergan, Inc. (“Allergan”), a multi-specialty healthcare company that was acquired by

Actavis PLC in 2015, from 1984 to March 2015, where he held positions of increasing responsibility, including most recently as the Executive Vice President, Finance and Business Development, and Chief Financial Officer from August 2014 to March 2015. Mr. Hindman served as Senior Vice President of Treasury, Risk and Investor Relations at Allergan from March 2002 to August 2014, and, from 1984 to 2002, Mr. Hindman served a variety of other finance positions at Allergan, including Senior Vice President, Finance and Controller; Vice President, Finance; Vice President, Financial Planning and Analysis; and Assistant Corporate Controller. Mr. Hindman currently serves on the board of directors of Aatru Medical, LLC, a private medical device company, Urovant Sciences, Inc., a private biopharmaceutical company, and Amolyt Pharma SAS, a private company specializing in developing therapeutic peptides for endocrine and metabolic disease. In the past five years, Mr. Hindman served on the board of directors of Millendo Therapeutics, Inc., a public biotechnology company, from June 2016 to June 2021, and Sienna Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., a public clinical-stage medical dermatology and aesthetics company, from August 2018 to December 2019. He has also provided financial consulting services to Cidara Therapeutics, Inc., a public biotechnology company, since July 2015, and to RANI Therapeutics Holdings, Inc., a privately held biotechnology company, from December 2017 to December 2018. Mr. Hindman holds a B.S. in Accounting from Loyola Marymount University and a M.B.A. from Pepperdine University. He is a certified public accountant in the state of California (inactive).

As a former Chief Financial Officer of a publicly traded global healthcare company with significant financial experience in the medical device industry, Mr. Hindman brings to our Board extensive experience in business development, strategy, financial planning and reporting, accounting, and public company governance.

Suzanne Winter has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer since July 2022, as our President since July 2021 and as our Senior Vice President, Chief Commercial Officer from October 2019 to June 2021. Ms. Winter has also served as a member of our Board since April 2022. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Winter was Vice President, Americas at Medtronic plc, a public medical device company, from June 2015 to October 2019, and General Manager, Detection and Guidance Solutions at General Electric Healthcare, a subsidiary of General Electric Company providing medical technology and pharmaceutical diagnostics, from March 2011 to June 2015. Prior to that, Ms. Winter had served various senior roles in worldwide sales, marketing and business development across a range of healthcare industry segments. Ms. Winter holds a B.S. with a specialization in chemistry from Saint Lawrence University and an M.B.A. from Harvard University Graduate School of Business.

Ms. Winter brings to our Board industry experience with global medical device and healthcare companies. Ms. Winter’s qualifications to serve on our Board include the perspective she brings as our Chief Executive Officer, and, among other skills and qualifications, her strategic management, sales and marketing and business development skills, commercial leadership experience and executive vision.

Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, in advance of his or her nomination, each director submits a contingent, irrevocable resignation that the Board may accept if that director fails to be elected by a majority of votes cast. In that situation, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee would make a recommendation to the Board about whether to accept such resignation, which the Board will promptly consider. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board may consider any factors they deem relevant in deciding whether to accept a director’s resignation.

Our directors’ primary skills and experiences are highlighted in the following matrix. The matrix is intended as a high-level summary and not an exhaustive list of each director’s skills or contributions to our Board. For more information on the factors we consider when assessing these skills and strengths, please see Corporate Governance and Board of Directors Matters—Skills and Strengths.

To be elected, directors must receive a majority of votes cast, meaning that the number of shares voted “FOR” a director’s election exceeds 50% of the number of votes cast with respect to that director’s election. You may vote either “FOR” or “AGAINST” each director nominee or you may abstain by voting “ABSTAIN”. Abstentions will not be counted for purposes of determining the number of votes cast with respect to the election of such a director, and thus will have no effect on the outcome of the vote. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the vote.

OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” EACH OF THE THREE NOMINEES FOR CLASS II DIRECTORS LISTED ABOVE.

We are asking our stockholders to approve an amended and restated version of the current Accuray Incorporated 2016 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2016 Plan”) to increase the shares of common stock reserved for issuance thereunder. The 2016 Plan was initially adopted in 2016 and was subsequently amended in 2018, 2020 and 2022. Subject to our stockholders’ approval at the Annual Meeting, our Board adopted an amended and restated version of the 2016 Plan (the “Amended 2016 Plan”) based on the recommendation of the Compensation Committee of the Board (the “Compensation Committee”). If approved by our stockholders, the Amended 2016 Plan will replace the current version of the 2016 Plan.

The Amended 2016 Plan would increase the shares of our common stock reserved for issuance thereunder by 5,000,000 shares. As a result, the total number of shares of our common stock that will be reserved for issuance under the Amended 2016 Plan will be (i) 27,420,000 shares, plus (ii) any shares which have been reserved but not issued pursuant to any awards granted under the Company’s 2007 Incentive Award Plan, as amended (the “2007 Plan”), as of November 17, 2016 and any shares subject to stock options, restricted stock units, performance shares, performance units, or similar awards granted under the 2007 Plan, that, on or after November 17, 2016, expire or otherwise terminate without having been exercised in full and shares issued pursuant to awards granted under the 2007 Plan that are forfeited to or repurchased by the Company, with the maximum number of shares to be added from the 2007 Plan equal to 10,084,101.

As further described below, the 2016 Plan provides for grants of equity awards to executives and employees of Accuray as well as non-employee directors and consultants. The purpose of the 2016 Plan is to provide equity incentives to executives, employees, non-employee directors and consultants in order to align their interests with long-term stockholder interests, motivate and reward them for achieving long-term results and help us retain key executives and employees in a competitive market for talent. We believe that increasing the number of shares issuable under the 2016 Plan is necessary in order to allow Accuray to continue to utilize equity awards to retain and attract the services of key individuals essential to our long-term growth and financial success and to further align their interests with those of our stockholders. We rely on equity awards to retain and attract key employees and non-employee Board members and believe that equity incentives are necessary for us to remain competitive with regard to retaining and attracting highly qualified individuals upon whom, in large measure, the future growth and success of Accuray depend. The availability of an adequate number of shares available for issuance under the 2016 Plan is an important factor in fulfilling these purposes.

We expect the number of shares of our common stock to be reserved for issuance under the Amended 2016 Plan to be sufficient to permit us to continue granting equity-based compensation at appropriate levels for the next year. The following factors were considered by the Compensation Committee and the Board when determining the number of additional shares of our common stock to reserve for issuance under the Amended 2016 Plan:

If stockholders do not approve the Amended 2016 Plan, the 2016 Plan will remain in place as currently in effect, but we may not have enough shares available under the 2016 Plan to continue granting the equity awards needed to successfully retain and attract the services of key individuals essential to our long-term growth and financial success.

The following paragraphs provide a summary of the main features of the Amended 2016 Plan and its operation. However, this summary does not provide a complete description of all of the Amended 2016 Plan’s provisions and is qualified in its entirety by the specific language of the Amended 2016 Plan. A copy of the Amended 2016 Plan is provided as Appendix A to this Proxy Statement.

The purposes of the Amended 2016 Plan are to attract and retain the best available personnel; to provide additional incentive to employees, directors, and consultants; and to promote the success of our business. These incentives are provided through the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance units, and performance shares as the plan administrator (as defined below) may determine.

Subject to the adjustment provisions contained in the Amended 2016 Plan, our stockholders are being asked to approve an increase in the number of shares of our common stock available for issuance under the Amended 2016 Plan by 5,000,000. If approved, the total number of shares of our common stock that will be reserved for issuance under the Amended 2016 Plan will be (i) 27,420,000 shares, plus (ii) any shares which have been reserved but not issued pursuant to any awards granted under the 2007 Plan as of November 17, 2016 and any shares subject to stock options, restricted stock units, performance shares, performance units, or similar awards granted under the 2007 Plan, that, on or after November 17, 2016, expire or otherwise terminate without having been exercised in full and shares issued pursuant to awards granted under the 2007 Plan that are forfeited to or repurchased by the Company, with the maximum number of shares to be added from the 2007 Plan equal to 10,084,101. The shares of our common stock may be authorized, but unissued or reacquired common stock.

If any award granted under the Amended 2016 Plan expires or becomes unexercisable without having been exercised in full or is forfeited to or repurchased by us due to failure to vest, then the expired, unexercised, forfeited, or repurchased shares of our common stock subject to such award will become available for future grant or sale under the Amended 2016 Plan. With respect to the exercise of stock appreciation rights, the gross shares of our common stock issued pursuant to a stock appreciation right will cease to be available under the Amended 2016 Plan. Shares of our common stock used to pay the exercise price of an award or to satisfy the tax withholding obligations related to an award will not become available for future grant or sale under the Amended 2016 Plan. If an award is paid out in cash rather than shares of our common stock, such payment will not reduce the number of shares of our common stock available for issuance under the Amended 2016 Plan.

For purposes of determining the number of shares of our common stock that remain available for issuance under the Amended 2016 Plan and the number of shares of our common stock returned to the Amended 2016 Plan’s share reserve, each share subject to an award other than an option, a stock appreciation right, or any other award that is based solely on an increase in value of the shares following the grant date will count as (i) for any such award granted before November 10, 2022, 1.71 shares or (ii) for any such award granted on or after November 10, 2022, 1.38 shares.

The Amended 2016 Plan contains annual grant limits that were originally intended to satisfy the “performance-based compensation” provisions of Section 162(m). The “performance-based compensation” provisions of Section 162(m) were eliminated by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 for tax years commencing after December 31, 2017. The Company has previously granted equity awards intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) and has decided to retain the following limits to not inadvertently lose grandfathered status for arrangements that continue to qualify for the “performance-based compensation” exception. Accordingly, the number of shares of our common stock covered by and the initial value of awards that can be issued to any particular employee or consultant under the Amended 2016 Plan in any fiscal year are limited to the amounts set forth below:

Awards granted under the Amended 2016 Plan generally cannot vest before the one-year anniversary of the date of grant unless the vesting of such award is accelerated due to a termination of the participant’s service under certain circumstances, due to the participant’s death or disability, or upon a Change in Control (as defined in the Amended 2016 Plan). However, an award may be granted without regard to this minimum vesting limitation as long as the shares subject to such award would not represent more than 5% of the shares reserved for issuance under the Amended 2016 Plan.

Dividends or other distributions payable with respect to shares subject to awards granted under the Amended 2016 Plan will not be paid before and unless the underlying shares vest, and will be subject to the same forfeitability provisions as the underlying shares. No dividends or other distributions will be paid with respect to shares that are subject to unexercised options or stock appreciation rights, although this rule will not preclude the administrator from exercising its powers and authority under the adjustment, liquidation and merger and change in control provisions of the Amended 2016 Plan.

The Amended 2016 Plan also provides that in any fiscal year, a non-employee board member may not be granted awards with a grant date fair value (determined in accordance with GAAP) exceeding $500,000. Any award granted to a participant while he or she was an employee or a consultant (other than a non-employee director) will not count for purposes of this limitation.

The Board has delegated administration of the Amended 2016 Plan to the Compensation Committee. The Board and the Compensation Committee may further delegate administration of the Amended 2016 Plan to any committee of the Board, or a committee of individuals satisfying applicable laws appointed by the Board in accordance with the terms of the 2016 Plan. For purposes of this summary of the Amended 2016 Plan, the term “administrator” will refer to the Board or any committee designated by the Board to administer the Amended 2016 Plan. To make grants to certain officers and key employees, the members of the committee must qualify as “non-employee directors” under Rule 16b-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. In the case of awards intended to qualify for the performance-based compensation exception under Section 162(m), administration must be by a committee comprised solely of two or more “outside directors” within the meaning of Section 162(m).

Subject to the terms of the Amended 2016 Plan, the administrator has the sole discretion to select the service providers who will receive awards; to determine the terms and conditions of awards; to approve forms of award agreements for use with the Amended 2016 Plan; to modify or amend each award (subject to the repricing restrictions of the Amended 2016 Plan), including to accelerate vesting or waive forfeiture restrictions; and to interpret the provisions of the Amended 2016 Plan and outstanding awards. The administrator may allow a participant to defer the receipt of payment of cash or delivery of shares that otherwise would be due to such participant. The administrator may make rules and regulations relating to sub-plans established for the purpose of satisfying applicable foreign laws and may make all other determinations deemed necessary or advisable for administering the Amended 2016 Plan. The administrator will issue all awards pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Amended 2016 Plan.

The administrator may not implement a program allowing for the cancellation of awards in exchange for different awards and/or cash, the transfer of an outstanding award to a financial institution or other person or entity selected by the administrator, or the increase or reduction of the exercise price of any outstanding award.

All types of awards may be granted to our non-employee directors and to employees and consultants of any parent, subsidiary, or affiliate corporation of ours. Incentive stock options may be granted only to employees of the Company or any parent or subsidiary corporation of the Company. As of August 31, 2023, we had approximately 1,032 employees (including one employee director), seven non-employee directors, and 130 consultants.

An option gives a participant the right to purchase a specified number of shares of our common stock for a fixed exercise price during a specified period of time. Each option granted under the Amended 2016 Plan will be evidenced by an award agreement specifying the number of shares of our common stock subject to the option and the other terms and conditions of the option, consistent with the requirements of the Amended 2016 Plan.

The exercise price per share of each option may not be less than the fair market value of a share of our common stock on the date of grant. However, any incentive stock option granted to a person who at the time of grant owns stock possessing more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of our stock or any parent or subsidiary corporation of ours (a “ten percent stockholder”) must have an exercise price per share equal to at least 110% of the fair market value of a share on the date of grant. The aggregate fair market value of the shares (determined on the grant date) covered by incentive stock options which first become exercisable by any participant during any calendar year also may not exceed $100,000. The fair market value of the common stock is generally the closing sales price of our stock as reported on the Nasdaq Stock Market.

Options will be exercisable at such times or under such conditions as determined by the administrator and set forth in the award agreement, subject to the minimum vesting limitation described above.

Upon the termination of a participant’s service, the unvested portion of the participant’s option generally expires. The vested portion of the option will remain exercisable for the period following the participant’s termination of service that was determined by the administrator and specified in the participant’s award agreement, and if no such period was determined by the administrator, the vested portion of the option will remain exercisable for: (i) 3 months following a termination of the participant’s service for reasons other than death or disability (and if the participant dies within the 3-month period, the period will be extended to one year from the date of the participant’s death) or (ii) 12 months following a termination of the participant’s service due to death or disability. However, if the exercise of an option is prevented by applicable law, the exercise period may be extended under certain circumstances described in the Amended 2016 Plan. In no event will the option be exercisable after the end of the option’s term.

The term of an option will be specified in the award agreement but may not be more than ten years (or five years for an incentive stock option granted to a ten percent stockholder).

The Amended 2016 Plan provides that the administrator will determine the acceptable form(s) of consideration for exercising an option. An option will be deemed exercised when we receive the notice of exercise and full payment for the shares of our common stock to be exercised, together with applicable tax withholdings.

A stock appreciation right gives a participant the right to receive the appreciation in the fair market value of our common stock between the date an award is granted and the date it is exercised. Upon exercise of a stock appreciation right, the holder of the award will be entitled to receive an amount determined by multiplying: (i) the difference between the fair market value of a share on the date of exercise and the exercise price by (ii) the number of exercised stock appreciation rights. We may pay the appreciation in cash, in shares of our common stock, or a combination of both. Each stock appreciation right granted under the Amended 2016 Plan will be evidenced by an award agreement specifying the exercise price and the other terms and conditions of the award.

The exercise price per share of each stock appreciation right may not be less than the fair market value of a share of our common stock on the date of grant.

Stock appreciation rights will be exercisable at such times or under such conditions as determined by the administrator and set forth in the award agreement, subject to the minimum vesting limitation described above.

The term of a stock appreciation right may not be more than ten years. The terms and conditions relating to the period of exercise of stock appreciation rights following the termination of a participant’s service are similar to those for options described above.

Awards of restricted stock are rights to acquire or purchase shares of our common stock that vest in accordance with the terms and conditions established by the administrator in its sole discretion, subject to the minimum vesting limitation described above. Unless otherwise provided by the administrator, a participant will forfeit any shares of restricted stock that have not vested by the termination of the participant’s service. Each restricted stock award granted will be evidenced by an award agreement specifying the number of shares of our common stock subject to the award and the other terms and conditions of the award.

Unless the administrator provides otherwise, and subject to the general rules in the Amended 2016 Plan related to dividends or other distributions (described above), participants holding shares of restricted stock will have voting rights and rights to dividends and other distributions with respect to such shares without regard to vesting. However, such dividends or other distributions will be subject to the same restrictions and forfeitability provisions that apply to the shares of restricted stock with respect to which they were paid. The administrator has the discretion to reduce or waive any restrictions and to accelerate the time at which any restrictions will lapse or be removed.

A restricted stock unit represents a right to receive cash or a share of our common stock if the performance goals or other vesting criteria set by the administrator are achieved or the restricted stock unit otherwise vests. Each award of restricted stock units granted under the Amended 2016 Plan will be evidenced by an award agreement specifying the number of shares of our common stock subject to the award and other terms and conditions of the award.

The administrator may set vesting conditions based upon the achievement of company-wide, divisional, business unit or individual goals (including, but not limited to, continued employment or service), applicable federal or state securities laws, or any other basis determined by the administrator, in its discretion, subject to the minimum vesting limitation described above.

After an award of restricted stock units has been granted, the administrator has the discretion to reduce or waive any restrictions or vesting criteria that must be met to receive a payout or to accelerate the time at which any restrictions will lapse or be removed. A participant will forfeit any unearned restricted stock units upon termination of his or her service. The administrator in its sole discretion may pay earned restricted stock units in cash, shares of our common stock, or a combination of both.

Performance units and performance shares are awards that will result in a payment to a participant only if performance goals established by the administrator are achieved or the awards otherwise vest. Performance units will have an initial value established by the administrator on or before the date of grant. Each performance share

will have an initial value equal to the fair market value of a share on the grant date. Performance units and performance shares will result in a payment to a participant only if the performance goals or other vesting criteria set by the administrator are achieved or the awards otherwise vest.

Each award of performance units or performance shares granted under the Amended 2016 Plan will be evidenced by an award agreement specifying the performance period and other terms and conditions of the award. The administrator may set vesting criteria based upon the achievement of company-wide, divisional, business unit or individual goals (including, but not limited to, continued employment or service), applicable federal or state securities laws, or any other basis determined by the administrator, in its discretion, subject to the minimum vesting limitation described above.

After an award of performance units or performance shares has been granted, the administrator has the discretion to accelerate, reduce, or waive any performance objectives or other vesting provisions for such performance units or performance shares, but may not increase the amount payable at a given level of performance.

The administrator has the discretion to pay earned performance units or performance shares in the form of cash, shares of our common stock (which will have an aggregate fair market value equal to the earned performance units or performance shares at the close of the applicable performance period), or a combination of both.

A participant will forfeit any performance units or performance shares that have not been earned or have not vested as of the termination of his or her service with us.

The granting and/or vesting of awards of restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares and performance units, and other incentives under the Amended 2016 Plan may be made subject to the attainment of performance goals relating to one or more business criteria that were originally intended to qualify for the “performance-based compensation” exception under Section 162(m). As noted earlier in this proposal, the “performance-based compensation” provisions of Section 162(m) were eliminated by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 for tax years commencing after December 31, 2017. The Company has previously granted equity awards intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) and has decided to retain provisions relating to Section 162(m) that no longer apply to future equity awards so as to not inadvertently lose grandfathered status for arrangements that continue to qualify for the “performance-based compensation” exception. Accordingly, provisions in the Amended 2016 Plan that permitted awards to be granted or earned based on achievement of pre-established performance criteria that had previously been approved by stockholders remain in the plan, but no longer have any practical effect.

To the extent necessary to comply with the “performance-based compensation” provisions of Section 162(m) for any grandfathered awards, following the completion of each performance period applicable to such awards, the administrator will certify in writing whether the applicable performance goals have been achieved for such performance period. A participant will be eligible to receive payment pursuant to an award for a performance period only if the performance goals for such period are achieved.

Awards generally are not transferable other than by will or by the laws of descent or distribution. However, the administrator may permit an award other than an incentive stock option to be assigned or transferred during a participant’s lifetime (i) under a domestic relations order, official marital settlement agreement, or other divorce or separation agreement, (ii) to a “family member” (within the meaning of Form S-8 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended) in connection with the participant’s estate plan, or (iii) or as required by law.

In the event of any dividend or other distribution (whether in the form of cash, shares, other securities, or other property), recapitalization, stock split, reverse stock split, reorganization, merger, consolidation, split-up, spin-off, combination, repurchase or exchange of shares or other securities or other change in the corporate structure affecting our common stock, the Amended 2016 Plan administrator, in order to prevent diminution or

enlargement of the benefits or potential benefits intended to be made available under the Amended 2016 Plan, will adjust the number and class of shares that may be delivered under the Amended 2016 Plan, and/or the number, class and price of shares of stock subject to outstanding awards, and the award grant limitations discussed above.

In the event of a proposed dissolution or liquidation of our company, the administrator will notify each participant as soon as practicable prior to the effective date of such proposed transaction. An award will terminate immediately prior to consummation of such proposed action to the extent the award has not been previously exercised.

The Amended 2016 Plan provides that, in the event of a merger or Change in Control, each award will be treated as the administrator determines, including that each award be assumed or substantially equivalent awards substituted by the acquiring or succeeding corporation or its affiliate. The administrator will not be required to treat all outstanding awards the same in the transaction.

If the successor corporation does not assume or substitute for the award, the participant will fully vest in and have the right to exercise all of his or her outstanding options and stock appreciation rights, and all restrictions on restricted stock and restricted stock units will lapse. With respect to awards with performance-based vesting that are not assumed or substituted for, unless the applicable award agreement provides otherwise, all performance goals or other vesting criteria will be deemed achieved at target levels (prorated based on the portion of the performance period that has elapsed as of immediately prior to the transaction), and all other terms and conditions will be deemed met. In addition, if an option or stock appreciation right is not assumed or substituted for, the administrator will notify the participant in writing or electronically that the option or stock appreciation right will be exercisable for a period of time determined by the administrator, in its sole discretion, and the option or stock appreciation right will terminate upon the expiration of such period.

For awards granted to our non-employee directors that are assumed or substituted for in a merger or Change in Control, upon the termination of a non-employee director’s service as a director of ours or the successor corporation (other than a voluntary resignation that is not made at the acquirer’s request), then (i) the non-employee director will fully vest in and have the right to exercise all of his or her outstanding options and stock appreciation rights, (ii) all restrictions on the non-employee director’s restricted stock and restricted stock units will lapse, and (iii) with respect to the non-employee director’s awards with performance-based vesting, all performance goals or other vesting criteria will be deemed achieved at target levels (prorated based on the portion of the performance period that elapsed as of immediately prior to the transaction) and all other terms and conditions will be deemed met.

Each award under the Amended 2016 Plan will be subject to our compensation recovery (“clawback”) policy, and the administrator also may specify in an award agreement that the participant’s rights, payments, and benefits with respect to an award will be subject to reduction, cancellation, forfeiture, or recoupment upon the occurrence of certain specified events.

The Amended 2016 Plan includes a recoupment policy, which provides that in the absence of a clawback policy, in the event the Company is required to restate its financial results or materially reduce publicly disclosed backlog figures, the Board will review the conduct of executive officers in relation to the restatement. If the Board determines that an executive officer has engaged in misconduct, or otherwise violated the Company's Code of Conduct and Ethics, and that such misconduct or violation contributed to the restatement or to the improper inclusion of a proposed system sale in publicly disclosed backlog, then the Board may, in its discretion, take appropriate action to remedy the misconduct or violation, such as seeking reimbursement of any portion of any performance-based or incentive compensation paid or awarded to the executive officer that is greater than what would have been paid or awarded if calculated based on the restated financial results or materially reduced backlog figures, to the extent not prohibited by governing law.

The administrator may require a participant to forfeit, return, or reimburse us all or a portion of the award and any amounts paid under the award in order to comply with such clawback policy, the recoupment policy described above, or applicable laws.

The Amended 2016 Plan will automatically terminate ten years from the date that the 2016 Equity Incentive Plan was originally adopted by the Board, unless terminated at an earlier time by the Board. The administrator may amend, alter, suspend, or terminate the Amended 2016 Plan at any time; provided that no amendment may be made without stockholder approval to the extent approval is necessary or desirable to comply with any applicable laws. No amendment, alteration, suspension, or termination may impair the rights of any participant unless mutually agreed otherwise between the participant and the administrator.

The following summary is intended only as a general guide to the U.S. federal income tax consequences of participation in the Amended 2016 Plan. The summary is based on existing U.S. laws and regulations as of the Record Date, and there can be no assurance that those laws and regulations will not change in the future. The summary does not purport to be complete and does not discuss the tax consequences upon a participant’s death, or the provisions of the income tax laws of any municipality, state or foreign country in which the participant may reside. As a result, tax consequences for any particular participant may vary based on individual circumstances.

A participant recognizes no taxable income for regular income tax purposes as a result of the grant or exercise of an option that qualifies as incentive stock option under Section 422 of the Code. If a participant exercises the option and then later sells or otherwise disposes of the shares of our common stock acquired through the exercise the option after both the two-year anniversary of the date the option was granted and the one-year anniversary of the exercise, the participant will recognize a capital gain or loss equal to the difference between the sale price of the shares and the exercise price, and we will not be entitled to any deduction for federal income tax purposes.

However, if the participant disposes of such shares either on or before the two-year anniversary of the date of grant or on or before the one-year anniversary of the date of exercise (a “disqualifying disposition”), any gain up to the excess of the fair market value of the shares of our common stock on the date of exercise over the exercise price generally will be taxed as ordinary income, unless the shares are disposed of in a transaction in which the participant would not recognize a loss (such as a gift). Any gain in excess of that amount will be a capital gain. If a loss is recognized, there will be no ordinary income, and such loss will be a capital loss. Any ordinary income recognized by the participant upon the disqualifying disposition of the shares generally should be deductible by us for federal income tax purposes, except to the extent such deduction is limited by applicable provisions of the Code.

For purposes of the alternative minimum tax, the difference between the option exercise price and the fair market value of the shares of our common stock on the exercise date is treated as an adjustment item in computing the participant’s alternative minimum taxable income in the year of exercise. In addition, special alternative minimum tax rules may apply to certain subsequent disqualifying dispositions of the shares or provide certain basis adjustments or tax credits for purposes.

A participant generally recognizes no taxable income as the result of the grant of such an option. However, upon exercising the option, the participant normally recognizes ordinary income equal to the amount that the fair market value of the shares of our common stock on such date exceeds the exercise price. If the participant is an employee, such ordinary income generally is subject to withholding of income and employment taxes. Upon the sale of the shares of our common stock acquired by the exercise of a non-statutory stock option, any gain or loss (based on the difference between the sale price and the fair market value on the exercise date) will be taxed as capital gain or loss. No tax deduction is available to us with respect to the grant of a non-statutory stock option or the sale of the shares acquired through the exercise of the non-statutory stock option.

In general, no taxable income is reportable when a stock appreciation right is granted to a participant. Upon exercise, the participant generally will recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the fair market value of any shares of our common stock received. Any additional gain or loss recognized upon any later disposition of the shares would be capital gain or loss.

A participant acquiring shares of restricted stock generally will recognize ordinary income equal to the fair market value of the shares on the vesting date. If the participant is an employee, such ordinary income generally is subject to withholding of income and employment taxes. The participant may elect, pursuant to Section 83(b) of the Code, to accelerate the ordinary income tax event to the date of acquisition by filing an election with the Internal Revenue Service no later than thirty days after the date the shares are acquired. Upon the sale of shares of our common stock acquired pursuant to a restricted stock award, any gain or loss, based on the difference between the sale price and the fair market value on the date the ordinary income tax event occurs, will be taxed as capital gain or loss.

There are no immediate tax consequences of receiving an award of restricted stock units. A participant who is awarded restricted stock units generally will be required to recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the fair market value of shares of our common stock issued to such participant at the end of the applicable vesting period or, if later, the settlement date elected by the administrator or a participant. Any additional gain or loss recognized upon any later disposition of any shares received would be capital gain or loss.

A participant generally will recognize no income upon the grant of a performance share or a performance unit award. Upon the settlement of such awards, participants normally will recognize ordinary income in the year of receipt in an amount equal to the cash received and the fair market value of any unrestricted shares of our common stock received. If the participant is an employee, such ordinary income generally is subject to withholding of income and employment taxes. Upon the sale of any shares of our common stock received, any gain or loss, based on the difference between the sale price and the fair market value on the date the ordinary income tax event occurs, will be taxed as capital gain or loss.

Section 409A provides certain requirements for non-qualified deferred compensation arrangements with respect to an individual’s deferral and distribution elections and permissible distribution events. Awards granted under the Amended 2016 Plan with a deferral feature will be subject to the requirements of Section 409A. If an award is subject to and fails to satisfy the requirements of Section 409A, the recipient of that award may recognize ordinary income on the amounts deferred under the award, to the extent vested, which may be prior to when the compensation is actually or constructively received. Also, if an award that is subject to Section 409A fails to comply with Section 409A’s provisions, Section 409A imposes an additional 20% federal income tax on compensation recognized as ordinary income, as well as interest on such deferred compensation.

We generally will be entitled to a tax deduction in connection with an award under the Amended 2016 Plan in an amount equal to the ordinary income realized by a participant and at the time the participant recognizes such income (for example, upon the exercise of a non-statutory stock option) except to the extent such deduction is limited by applicable provisions of the Code. Special rules limit the deductibility of compensation paid to our CEO and other “covered employees” as determined under Section 162(m) and applicable guidance. Under Section 162(m), the annual compensation paid to any of these specified executives will be deductible only to the extent that it does not exceed $1,000,000 in any taxable year. For tax years beginning before January 1, 2018, compensation in excess of $1,000,000 could be deducted if it qualified as “performance-based compensation” within the meaning of Section 162(m); however, this exception has been repealed effective for taxable years

beginning after December 31, 2017, such that compensation paid to our covered employees in excess of $1,000,000 will not be deductible unless it qualifies for transition relief applicable to certain arrangements in place as of November 2, 2017 that has not been materially modified after that date.

THE FOREGOING IS ONLY A SUMMARY OF THE EFFECT OF U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAXATION UPON PARTICIPANTS AND THE COMPANY WITH RESPECT TO AWARDS UNDER THE AMENDED 2016 PLAN. IT DOES NOT PURPORT TO BE COMPLETE AND DOES NOT DISCUSS THE IMPACT OF EMPLOYMENT OR OTHER TAX REQUIREMENTS, THE TAX CONSEQUENCES OF A PARTICIPANT’S DEATH, OR THE PROVISIONS OF THE INCOME TAX LAWS OF ANY MUNICIPALITY, STATE, OR FOREIGN COUNTRY IN WHICH THE PARTICIPANT MAY RESIDE.

The benefits that will be awarded or paid under the Amended 2016 Plan are not currently determinable. Any future awards granted to eligible participants under the Amended 2016 Plan will be made at the discretion of the administrator, and no such determination as to future awards or who might receive them has been made.

The number of awards that an employee, director, or consultant may receive under the Amended 2016 Plan is in the discretion of the administrator and therefore cannot be determined in advance. The following table sets forth: (i) the aggregate number of shares subject to service-based restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and performance stock units (“PSUs”) granted under the 2016 Plan during fiscal year 2023 to each of our named executive officers; executive officers, as a group; directors who are not executive officers, as a group; and all employees who are not executive officers, as a group and (ii) the grant-date value of shares subject to such RSUs and PSUs. No options were granted to any of our named executive officers, directors or employees during fiscal year 2023. As of August 31, 2023, the closing price of a share of our common stock was $2.85.

The Amended 2016 Plan must be approved by the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the subject matter. For purposes of this proposal, abstentions will have the same effect as a vote AGAINST the proposal. Broker non-votes will have no

effect on the outcome of the vote. This vote will also constitute approval of the Amended 2016 Plan under the Listing Rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market (the “Nasdaq Listing Rules”).

OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF THE AMENDED AND RESTATED 2016 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN.

We are submitting to our stockholders for approval, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, the compensation of our named executive officers (“NEOs,” or each, an “NEO”) as disclosed in this Proxy Statement in accordance with Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (a “say-on-pay” vote). This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our NEOs and the philosophy, policies and practices described in this Proxy Statement. In this proposal, we are asking our stockholders to provide advisory approval of the compensation of our NEOs, as such compensation is described in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the tabular disclosure regarding such compensation, and the accompanying narrative disclosure set forth in this Proxy Statement. We have held a say-on-pay vote annually since our first say-on-pay vote in 2011 and assuming our Board’s recommendation with respect to Proposal Four is approved, our next say-on-pay vote will be held at next year’s annual meeting of stockholders.

The Compensation Committee of our Board (the “Compensation Committee”) considers the results of each annual stockholder advisory vote on the compensation of our NEOs and stockholder feedback on our executive compensation program. At our 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, approximately 88.8% of the votes cast (excluding abstentions and broker non-votes) were voted in favor of the compensation of our then-named executive officers and, indirectly, our executive compensation program. The Compensation Committee viewed these results as support for our executive compensation program and, as a result, continued to apply the same general principles and philosophy as in the prior fiscal year to our executive compensation programs, policies and practices for fiscal 2023 and kept such programs consistent with the prior fiscal year, which is discussed in more detail in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” below.

Our executive compensation program is designed to enable us to attract, retain, motivate and appropriately reward the individuals who can help us successfully execute our business strategy and promote the best interests of our stockholders. In deciding how to vote on this proposal, our Board urges you to consider the following factors, which are more fully discussed in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” below:

The Compensation Committee will continue to analyze our executive compensation policies and practices and adjust them as appropriate to reflect our performance and competitive needs.

The proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of shares present at the Annual Meeting, in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote on the proposal. Abstentions will be treated as being present and entitled to vote on the proposal and, therefore, will have the same effect as a vote AGAINST the proposal. Broker non-votes, if any, will have no effect on the outcome of the vote.

Because your vote is advisory, it will not be binding on our Board or the Compensation Committee. However, the Compensation Committee, which is responsible for designing and approving our executive compensation program, and our Board value the opinions expressed by our stockholders and will consider the outcome of the vote when making future compensation decisions for our NEOs.

Based on the information provided above and within “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” in this Proxy Statement, we request that you indicate your support for our executive compensation philosophy, policies and practices by voting in favor of the following resolution:

OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE ADVISORY APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AS DESCRIBED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT.

Pursuant to Section 14A(a)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, at least once every six years, we must provide our stockholders with an opportunity to vote (on an advisory basis) on how frequently we should seek a non-binding vote on the compensation of our named executive officers (“NEOs”), as disclosed pursuant to the SEC’s compensation disclosure rules. By voting on this proposal, stockholders may indicate whether they would prefer we hold a non-binding vote on NEO compensation once every one, two, or three years.

After careful consideration, our Board of Directors has determined that continuing to hold non-binding vote on NEO compensation annually is most appropriate for the Company, and therefore our Board recommends that you vote for a one-year interval for the non-binding vote on NEO compensation. Our Board believes that it is good corporate governance practice and in the best interests of our stockholders to continue to give our stockholders the right to cast an advisory vote every year on their approval of the compensation arrangements of our NEOs, which allows them to provide us, on an annual basis, with their input on our executive compensation philosophy, policies and practices as disclosed in our proxy statement. We have held a say-on-pay vote annually since our first say-on-pay vote in 2011. After this year, our next required say-when-on-pay vote will be held in 2029.

You may cast your vote on your preferred voting frequency by choosing the option of one year, two years, three years or you may choose “ABSTAIN”. The frequency that receives the highest number of votes will be considered the frequency recommended by our stockholders to hold a non-binding, advisory vote on the compensation of our NEOs. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the vote.

Because your vote is advisory, it will not be binding on our Board or the Compensation Committee. However, the Compensation Committee and our Board value the opinions expressed by our stockholders and will consider the outcome of the vote when making a decision on the frequency of future say-on-pay votes.

OUR BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE TO HOLD FUTURE ADVISORY VOTES TO APPROVE THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS EVERY ONE YEAR.

The Audit Committee of our Board (the “Audit Committee”) has selected Grant Thornton LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm to perform the audit of our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2024. Grant Thornton LLP has audited our consolidated financial statements since fiscal year 2007.

Stockholder ratification of the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2024 is not required by law, the Nasdaq Listing Rules, our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation or our Amended and Restated Bylaws (“Bylaws”). However, our Board is submitting the selection of Grant Thornton LLP to our stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate governance and practice. If the stockholders fail to ratify the appointment, the Audit Committee will reconsider whether or not to retain Grant Thornton LLP. Even if the selection is ratified, we may appoint a different independent registered public accounting firm during the fiscal year if the Audit Committee determines that such a change would be in the best interests of our Company and our stockholders.

Representatives of Grant Thornton LLP are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting. They will have an opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and are expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions from our stockholders.

The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of our independent auditors. The Audit Committee retained Grant Thornton LLP to audit our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. The estimated aggregate fees billed by Grant Thornton LLP for all services relating to fiscal 2023 and 2022 are as follows:

The Audit Committee pre-approves all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm. These services may include audit services, audit-related services and tax services, as well as, to a very limited extent, specifically designated non-audit services that, in the opinion of the Audit Committee, will not impair the independence of the registered public accounting firm. Pre-approval is detailed as to the particular service or category of services and is generally subject to a specific budget. The independent registered public accounting firm and management are required to periodically report to the Audit

Committee regarding the extent of services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm in accordance with this pre-approval, including the fees for the services performed to date. In addition, the Audit Committee also may pre-approve particular services on a case-by-case basis, as required.

The proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of shares present at the Annual Meeting, in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote on the proposal. Abstentions will be treated as being present and entitled to vote on the proposal and, therefore, will have the same effect as a vote AGAINST the proposal. Broker non-votes, if any, will have no effect on the outcome of the vote.

OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF GRANT THORNTON LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2024.

The Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing our accounting and financial reporting processes and internal control systems, the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of Grant Thornton LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, and audits of our financial statements, all pursuant to the Audit Committee’s written charter. Grant Thornton LLP reports directly to the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee has the authority to obtain advice and assistance from outside legal, accounting or other advisors as the Audit Committee deems necessary to carry out its duties and to receive appropriate funding, as determined by the Audit Committee, from our Company for such advice and assistance.

Management is responsible for preparing our financial statements and for our financial reporting processes, accounting policies, systems of internal controls and disclosure controls and procedures. For our fiscal year ended June 30, 2023, Grant Thornton LLP was responsible for expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Grant Thornton LLP was also responsible for performing an independent audit and expressing an opinion on the conformity of our audited financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. In this context, the Audit Committee hereby reports as follows:

AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The foregoing Audit Committee report shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under these acts, except to the extent we incorporate by reference into such filings.

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis provides information regarding the fiscal 2023 compensation program for our Named Executive Officers (“NEOs”), which includes (i) our principal executive officer, (ii) our principal financial officer, and (iii) our other three most highly-compensated executive officers at fiscal year-end, who were as follows:

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes the material elements of our executive compensation program during fiscal 2023. It also provides an overview of our executive compensation philosophy, including our principal compensation policies and practices. Finally, it analyzes how and why the Compensation Committee and in the case of our President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), the independent members of our Board, arrived at their specific compensation decisions for our NEOs in fiscal 2023 and discusses the key factors that they considered in determining NEO compensation, which included stockholder feedback and the results of our 2022 “Say-on-Pay” vote.

In fiscal 2023, despite being impacted by global supply chain challenges, inflation, and other macroeconomic factors, we achieved record annual revenue. Overall, financial results were mixed, including the following:

Our Board and management are committed to maintaining sound and effective compensation and governance programs, with policies and programs reflecting best practices and designed to build value for our stockholders. At our 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, approximately 88.8% of the votes cast (excluding abstentions and broker non-votes) were voted in favor of the compensation of our then-named executive officers and, indirectly, our executive compensation program. In evaluating our executive compensation program, policies, and practices for fiscal 2023, the Compensation Committee was mindful of the support our stockholders expressed for the Company’s efforts to better enhance the link between executive pay and company performance in prior years, including fiscal 2022, as well as other discussions with our stockholders. As a result, the Compensation Committee concluded that the general compensation principles and philosophy used to determine the components of executive compensation for fiscal 2022 continue to closely align the interests of our executive officers to the long-term interests of our stockholders and promote retention. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee continued to apply the same general principles and philosophy in determining executive compensation for fiscal 2023.

The Compensation Committee recognizes the importance of having on-going and open conversations with our stockholders to solicit their feedback. In an effort to continue to increase the level of stockholder engagement, the Company continued its investor outreach efforts to engage with our stockholders and better understand their perspectives on a variety of matters, including the Company’s performance, governance, human capital management, and executive compensation. For fiscal 2023, the Compensation Committee invited each of our top 15 institutional stockholders holding approximately 44% of our outstanding common stock as of November 10, 2022 to discuss our executive compensation programs, policies, and practices. In addition to the foregoing, we engaged with our stockholders throughout fiscal 2023 through various meetings with members of our executive team, including our CEO and Chief Financial Officer, and on occasion members of the Board, including the Chairman of the Board. These interactions included the following:

In fiscal 2023, we held over 90 such meetings with one or more institutional stockholders so that they could provide feedback to our executive officers and, in some instances, directly to our Board, including the Chairman of our Board. In the aggregate, the institutional stockholders that participated in such meetings in fiscal 2023 held over 17% of our outstanding common stock and included six of our largest 25 stockholders, in each case as of November 10, 2022. Such ongoing investor outreach helps us understand investor perspectives and to communicate on a variety of corporate governance topics, including our executive compensation program, policies, and practices. We strive to make these events an open forum to actively engage our stockholders in dialogue about all matters, from our financial and operational trends to governance issues, including executive compensation. These interactions allow investors the opportunity to meet, ask questions of, and provide advice to, our executive officers. We value the insights gained from our discussion with our stockholders and find them to be helpful even when points of view vary. The Compensation Committee, as well as the independent members of our Board, consider such stockholder feedback when adopting policies affecting our executive compensation program. We will continue to seek opportunities for dialogue with our stockholders on executive compensation and other matters on an ongoing basis. We are committed to maintaining or bettering such level of stockholder engagement going forward.

Based on its desire to incentivize our senior leadership team for fiscal 2023, which it believes embodies the appropriate experience and skills to successfully execute our long-term business objectives, and taking into account global supply chain challenges, inflation, and other global macroeconomic conditions and the uncertainties caused with respect to the Company and its performance, the Compensation Committee (and, in the case of our CEO, the independent members of our Board) took the following actions with respect to the compensation of our NEOs:

We believe that there should be a strong relationship between pay and performance, and our executive compensation program reflects this belief. In particular, cash incentive award opportunities and long-term incentive compensation in the form of equity awards represent a majority of the target total direct compensation opportunities of our executive officers, including our NEOs, as reflected in the charts below. These variable compensation elements are considered “at risk” as they are directly dependent upon the achievement of pre-established performance objectives and/or stock price performance.

We structured our cash incentive award opportunities to focus on the achievement of specific short-term financial performance goals that are aligned with our business strategy and would further our longer-term growth objectives. As such, our Company Bonus Plan only funds if we achieve multiple pre-established financial performance objectives, placing our NEOs’ target cash incentive opportunities entirely at risk.

For fiscal 2023, our long-term incentive compensation program was comprised of a combination of service-based RSU awards and PSU awards. The Compensation Committee continued with the strategy from fiscal 2022 of including PSU awards rather than options to purchase shares of our common stock to continue to better align executive compensation with sustained financial and operational performance. The Compensation Committee believes that this combination of awards appropriately balances the various objectives of our long-term incentive compensation program because it promotes long-term value creation critical to driving stockholder value, directly aligns executive compensation with stockholder interests through share ownership, and encourages our key executive officers to remain engaged with our organization through the vesting date of the awards, which is typically a multi-year period.

The following charts illustrate the mix of the fiscal 2023 target total direct compensation opportunities for our NEOs between base salary, target cash incentive opportunities and long-term incentive compensation in the form of equity awards, which are further discussed under the heading “Compensation Elements” below.

The following chart illustrates the allocation of the fiscal 2023 target and realized direct compensation for our NEOs between base salary, cash incentive award opportunities and long-term incentive compensation in the form of equity awards. A moderate portion of the “at-risk” cash compensation of our NEOs was earned in fiscal 2023 as a result of mixed results in achieving the pre-established performance objectives under the Company Bonus Plan. As a result, the Company Bonus Plan was funded at 55% of target for fiscal 2023 and each NEO received 55% of his or her target cash incentive award opportunity for fiscal 2023 (other than Mr. Chalke, who received a contractually guaranteed annual cash incentive award pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement).

Target total direct compensation in the chart above includes base salary, target cash incentive award opportunities and the grant date fair value of equity awards, but excludes “other compensation” as reported in the Fiscal 2023 Summary Compensation Table under “Executive Compensation” below. Realized compensation includes base salary paid, the actual cash incentive award paid and the value of equity awards granted prior to, but vesting in, fiscal 2023. The performance stock option granted to our CEO in fiscal 2021 was earned for the performance period ending June 30, 2023 and no stock options were exercised by our executive officers in fiscal 2023.

To achieve our objectives, we need a highly talented and seasoned management team with the integrity, skills, and dedication necessary to oversee a dynamic and growing organization and the vision to anticipate and respond to future market developments. Our executive officers must be capable of fulfilling our long-term business strategy, including expanding the growth of our products into the market.

Accordingly, the overarching compensation philosophy approved by the Compensation Committee for fiscal 2023 was grounded in the following principles and objectives:

Consistent with this philosophy, a significant portion of our NEOs’ target total direct compensation in fiscal 2023 was comprised of variable cash incentives (that is, cash incentive award opportunities) and equity-based compensation, consisting of RSU awards and PSU awards, in order to align compensation with our business performance and the long-term interests of our stockholders.

The compensation of our executive officers, including our NEOs, consisted of the following elements in fiscal 2023:

We maintain sound corporate governance standards as reflected in our executive compensation policies and practices. The following policies and practices were in effect in fiscal 2023:

The Compensation Committee oversees our executive compensation philosophy and administers our executive compensation program. The Compensation Committee is responsible for reviewing the performance and approving the compensation of our executive officers, including our NEOs (other than our CEO). The independent members of our Board are responsible for reviewing the performance of our CEO and approving our CEO’s compensation. The Compensation Committee is also responsible for reviewing and recommending to our Board the compensation of our non-employee directors and establishing and regularly reviewing the compensation and benefits policies for our executive officers. For additional information on the Compensation Committee, including the scope of its authority, see “Corporate Governance and Board of Directors Matters—Compensation Committee,” below.

At the beginning of each fiscal year, our Board, after consulting with management, establishes our corporate performance objectives, and the Compensation Committee, after consulting with management, reviews and approves the individual performance objectives for each executive officer (other than our CEO) and makes decisions with respect to any base salary adjustment, target cash incentive award opportunities and equity awards for our executive officers, including our NEOs (other than our CEO), for the upcoming fiscal year. The independent members of our Board, based on the recommendations of the Compensation Committee, approve the individual performance objectives for our CEO and make decisions with respect to our CEO’s base salary adjustment, target cash incentive award opportunity and equity awards. After the end of the fiscal year, the Compensation Committee assesses the performance of our executive officers, including our NEOs (other than our CEO), to determine the payouts for the cash incentive award opportunities for the previous year, and the independent members of our Board assess the performance of our CEO to determine the cash incentive award payout for our CEO in light of the previously established performance objectives.

To aid in its deliberations, each fiscal year our CEO provides recommendations to the Compensation Committee regarding the individual compensation elements for each of our executive officers, including our NEOs (other than the CEO). Prior to formulating these recommendations, our CEO conducts an annual performance review of our other executive officers to evaluate their performance for the prior fiscal year based

on the objectives previously established by the Compensation Committee. Our CEO then presents the results of these evaluations, along with our CEO’s recommendations with regard to their compensation for the current fiscal year, including base salary adjustments, target cash incentive award opportunities and payouts and equity awards, to the Compensation Committee for its consideration. In advance of making such recommendations, our CEO often reviews competitive market data provided by the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant and takes into consideration such factors as our compensation philosophy, achievement of individual performance goals and objectives and internal pay equity.

Our CEO also assists our Board in formulating our performance objectives for the fiscal year and the Compensation Committee in developing the individual performance objectives for each executive officer. The Compensation Committee reviews such recommendations as it deems appropriate prior to approving them or, in the case of our CEO, prior to recommending them to our Board for approval.

Similarly, our CEO’s performance is reviewed annually by the Compensation Committee as well as the other independent members of our Board as part of their deliberations with respect to our CEO’s compensation. The Compensation Committee makes recommendations regarding the compensation of our CEO to the independent members of our Board, who approve all elements of our CEO’s compensation.

Typically, our CEO is present at Compensation Committee meetings where executive compensation and corporate and individual performance are discussed and evaluated (except when our CEO’s own compensation and performance are determined or reviewed). From time to time, our CFO, Chief Legal Officer, and Chief Administrative Officer, who oversees our Human Resources function, may also attend Compensation Committee meetings at which executive compensation matters are discussed and participate in those discussions (except when their own compensation and performance are determined or reviewed).

The Compensation Committee retained Exequity LLP, a national compensation consulting firm (“Exequity”), as its advisor to provide advice with respect to our executive and non-employee director compensation programs for fiscal 2023. Exequity advised the Compensation Committee with respect to trends in executive compensation, the development of the Compensation Peer Group (as defined below) for fiscal 2023, the determination of compensation programs, the assessment of competitive pay levels and mix (for example, the proportion of fixed pay to incentive pay and the proportion of annual cash pay to long-term incentive pay) and setting compensation levels. Exequity also consulted with the Compensation Committee to formulate, design, and recommend new programs to better align our executive officers’ performance with the interests of our stockholders.

Exequity did not perform any other services for us or the Compensation Committee in fiscal 2023. Based on its review, the Compensation Committee has determined that Exequity’s services did not raise any conflict of interest and, after consideration of the factors set forth in the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Nasdaq Listing Rules, determined that Exequity was independent within the meaning of those rules and standards.

For fiscal 2023, the Compensation Committee determined the compensation of our executive officers, including our NEOs, including the allocation between cash and equity compensation based on an analysis of the data reflected in the Radford April 2022 High-Tech Industry Survey covering companies within the technology, life sciences, and medical devices industries with $200 million to $500 million in annual revenue, as well as an assessment of our performance and compensation practices against a peer group of 18 medical device companies (the “Compensation Peer Group”) with whom we compete for executive talent, which are in our industry sector or which have comparable financial and organizational characteristics (collectively, the “Relevant Market Data”). The Compensation Peer Group was recommended by Exequity and submitted to the Compensation Committee for its review and approval. The Compensation Peer Group for fiscal 2023 was approved by the Compensation Committee in March 2022.

The criteria used to develop the fiscal 2023 Compensation Peer Group included the following:

Primary Factors:

The fiscal 2023 Compensation Peer Group is set forth below:

The following table summarizes our relative positioning to the fiscal 2023 Compensation Peer Group when the Compensation Committee conducted its annual review of our executive compensation program during fiscal 2022.

The Compensation Committee annually reviews the composition of the Compensation Peer Group to ensure it is the most relevant set of companies to use for comparison purposes.

In evaluating the base salaries of our executive officers for fiscal 2023, establishing target cash incentive award opportunities and granting equity awards, the Compensation Committee reviewed the Relevant Market Data to inform its decisions on individual compensation elements, in particular the competitive reasonableness of such elements and to ensure that its decisions were consistent with our compensation philosophy and strategy. While the Compensation Committee considered the Relevant Market Data, it did not make its decisions solely based on targeting compensation to specific benchmarks against the Relevant Market Data. Instead, the Compensation Committee took an approach consistent with its intention to (i) set performance objectives for cash incentive compensation so that target level payouts would only be made if our executive officers and the Company performed at a superior level that would be difficult to achieve and (ii) provide our executive officers with the ability to earn above-market compensation for exceptional performance that furthered our long-term financial and strategic goals.

As part of our annual executive compensation approval process, with the assistance of Exequity, the Compensation Committee reviews each executive officer’s compensation history for the past five years or, if an executive officer was hired within the past five years, since his or her date of hire, including each compensation element and how it compared to the Relevant Market Data for the most recent fiscal year. The Compensation Committee also reviews tally sheets setting forth the expected value of annual compensation and benefits for each executive officer, including our NEOs, which includes base salaries, potential cash incentive award payouts and minimum and maximum levels, long-term incentive compensation, including the mix of equity awards and the number of shares of our common stock subject to outstanding stock options, RSU awards, and PSU awards granted, including the fair value at grant, and the annualized cost of other benefits.

These tally sheets also set forth the accumulated value of the compensation and benefits for each executive officer, including our NEOs, which includes the accumulated value of equity awards and the accumulated value

of potential payouts under different separation from employment scenarios, including under our post-employment compensation arrangements. Reviewing tally sheets each year facilitates the Compensation Committee’s evaluation of the reasonableness of the total accumulated value of the compensation and benefits provided to each executive officer, including our NEOs. For fiscal 2023, the tally sheets served to assist the Compensation Committee and, in the case of our CEO, the independent members of our Board, in understanding the total annual compensation opportunity for each executive officer and relative compensation among our executive officers, but did not affect any specific decision relating to our executive officers’ compensation.

We believe that a competitive base salary is the essential foundation to providing an appropriate total direct compensation package for our executive officers, including our NEOs. We use base salary to fairly and competitively to compensate our executive officers for the jobs we ask them to perform. We view base salary as the most stable component of our executive compensation program, as this amount is not at risk.

The Compensation Committee and, in the case of our CEO, the independent members of our Board, makes adjustments to base salary when it believes there is a deviation from market based on a review of the Relevant Market Data, when an individual is promoted or assumes an increase in responsibility or when the Compensation Committee determines that an individual’s performance warrants an adjustment. The Compensation Committee (or in the case of our CEO, the independent members of our Board) reviews the base salary levels of our executive officers each year to determine whether an adjustment is warranted.

For fiscal 2023, after considering competitive market data, individual performance and retention, the Compensation Committee (and, in the case of our CEO, the independent members of our Board) increased the base salaries of our NEOs (excluding our CEO, who had already received a base salary increase in connection with her promotion to CEO in July 2022) from their final fiscal 2022 salary levels, as shown below:

The annual base salaries earned and paid to our NEOs are reported in the Fiscal 2023 Summary Compensation Table under “Executive Compensation” below.

Typically, the cash incentive awards under our Company Bonus Plan serve to reinforce our performance-based culture. The Compensation Committee believes in providing our executive officers, including our NEOs, with a target base salary compensation opportunity near market median and target total cash compensation opportunity above the market median tied to the achievement of challenging, pre-established corporate performance objectives that are aligned with our business strategy. Historically, due to the challenging nature of the objectives that the Compensation Committee established, payouts under our Company Bonus Plan have averaged approximately 62% of their target level from fiscal 2013 through fiscal 2022, excluding fiscal 2020, where cash incentive awards were eliminated for such fiscal year due to the COVID-19 pandemic. As with base salary, each executive officer’s target cash incentive award opportunity is set with reference to his or her performance over the previous fiscal year as evaluated by our CEO or, in the case of our CEO, the independent members of our Board, his or her experience and responsibilities, the critical nature of his or her position relative to our success, our retention needs, the Relevant Market Data, and our CEO’s recommendation with respect to our other NEOs.

At the beginning of the fiscal year, the Compensation Committee reviewed and approved the corporate performance objectives and related target levels for the fiscal 2023 cash incentive awards and approved the cash incentive award payout for each executive officer, including our NEOs, but excluding our CEO, whose target cash incentive award opportunity and payout was reviewed and approved by the independent members of our Board. The table below sets forth, for fiscal 2023, the target cash incentive award opportunity for each of our NEOs as a percentage of base salary and in absolute dollars.

All employees, including our NEOs, are eligible to participate in the Company Bonus Plan, which was adopted by the Compensation Committee. For fiscal 2023, our cash incentive awards were designed to reward our executive officers, including our NEOs, based on our financial performance. In establishing the fiscal 2023 cash incentive award program for our executive officers, including our NEOs, the Compensation Committee determined that their award opportunities should be directly linked to achieving multiple corporate financial performance objectives that were considered key drivers of the Company’s long-term strategy and stockholder value creation.

The bonus pool under the Company Bonus Plan would fund only if the corporate financial performance objectives established by our Board or the Compensation Committee were achieved at pre-established threshold levels as of June 30, 2023. Accordingly, if the bonus pool did not fund, no executive officer would be entitled to any cash incentive award payout under the Company Bonus Plan, regardless of his or her individual performance. To the extent that the bonus pool was funded, the Company Bonus Plan entitled each executive officer to an actual cash incentive award payout as determined by the formula below, provided that the Compensation Committee or our Board could exercise positive or negative discretion to increase or reduce the overall funding percentage and/or to increase or reduce any individual award payout, including for individual performance in accordance with the terms of the Company Bonus Plan.

For fiscal 2023, the Compensation Committee established three corporate financial performance objectives: orders (net of cancellations), revenue, and adjusted EBITDA for purposes of the Company Bonus Plan. These performance objectives were applied in the same manner to all of our executive officers, including our NEOs. The Compensation Committee established target levels and minimum funding thresholds with respect to each performance objective, thereby requiring that we achieve the minimum threshold set for each objective in order for any funding to occur with respect to that measure.

The performance objectives and their relative weightings, target levels and minimum funding thresholds for fiscal 2023, as well as the actual performance attained, were as follows:

The revenue objective was calculated on a GAAP basis, consistent with the GAAP financial measures reported in our quarterly earnings releases. For purposes of the Company Bonus Plan, “orders (net of cancellations),” a non-GAAP financial measure, was calculated by subtracting cancellations from backlog from orders entered into backlog, in each case during the performance period, and “adjusted EBITDA,” a non-GAAP financial measure, was calculated by excluding any bonus accrual amounts. The Compensation Committee could, in its discretion, approve exclusions in the nature of one-time occurrences, extraordinary items or events outside management’s control.

With respect to each performance objective, the Compensation Committee assessed whether and to what extent that such performance was met. The funding with respect to each performance objective was based on a funding slope in a straight line from 50% at the minimum threshold level to 100% at the target level, with the maximum funding opportunity set at 150%.

Based on our actual corporate performance results, the funding methodology resulted in funding of the bonus pool at 55% of the target level for fiscal 2023. Our Board and our Compensation Committee declined to exercise any discretion to adjust the achievement of the performance metrics under the Company Bonus Plan despite the effects that certain global macroeconomic factors, including inflation and currency fluctuations, were having on the Company’s performance. Accordingly, based on these performance levels, the cash incentive award opportunities and payouts made to our NEOs for fiscal 2023 were as follows:

The cash incentive award payouts for fiscal 2023 are reported in the Fiscal 2023 Summary Compensation Table under “Executive Compensation” below.

We believe that long-term incentive compensation in the form of equity awards provide a strong alignment between the interests of our stockholders and our executive officers, including our NEOs, and serve as an important retention tool, especially given the highly competitive environment in which we compete to attract and retain talent. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee seeks to motivate and retain our executive officers through the use of equity awards consistent with the reasonable management of our overall equity compensation

expense and stockholder dilution. The Compensation Committee and, in the case of our CEO, the independent members of our Board, grants equity awards to our executive officers, including our NEOs, at the beginning of each fiscal year, as a reward for past corporate and individual performance, as an incentive for future performance, and to satisfy our retention objectives.

In the past, our executive officers have been granted service-based RSU awards, performance-based equity in the form of PSU awards, market-based performance unit (“MSU”) awards, and options to purchase shares of our common stock, all of which, to the extent they remain outstanding, continue to provide incentive to our executive officers to drive stockholder value over the relevant vesting or performance period, as applicable.

Historically, the size of an executive officer’s equity award is determined by the Compensation Committee and, in the case of our CEO, the independent members of our Board, after considering his or her performance against his or her individual goals and objectives over the last fiscal year as evaluated by our CEO (or, in the case of our CEO, as evaluated by the independent members of our Board), an evaluation of his or her target total direct compensation, an evaluation of his or her accumulated equity holdings, the critical nature of his or her position relative to our success, our retention needs, the Relevant Market Data, internal parity, role hierarchy and such other factors as the Compensation Committee or the independent members of our Board, as applicable, determines relevant.

For fiscal 2023, given the continued desire to (i) drive alignment between executive interests and the interests of our stockholders, (ii) properly incentivize our executive officers to effectively execute our growth strategy, and (iii) more closely tie pay and performance, the Compensation Committee, and in the case of our CEO, the independent members of our Board, granted equity awards under our long-term incentive compensation program in November 2022 to our executive officers (including our NEOs) with an equal mix of 50% PSU awards and 50% RSU awards.

With respect to the PSU awards granted to these NEOs, such awards will vest upon the achievement of one or more of the performance goals, subject to the individual continuing to be a service provider through such date. The three-year performance goals measured at the end of fiscal 2025 require the Company to achieve (i) total revenue, which is weighted at 75%, and (ii) EBITDA margin, which is weighted at 25%, at certain rigorous, pre-determined threshold, target or maximum levels. If such performance goals meet or exceed the pre-determined threshold, target or maximum levels, the target number of shares subject to the PSU award would vest based on a straight line slope from 50% of the target shares at the minimum threshold level to 100% of the target shares at the target level, with a maximum of 150% of the target shares vesting at the maximum achievement level, all upon certification of such achievement by the Compensation Committee. For purposes of determining whether the performance goals are achieved, total revenue will be calculated based on GAAP numbers and EBITDA margin will be calculated by the Company in its reasonable discretion.

The Compensation Committee believes this mix of PSU and RSU awards was appropriate for these NEOs because it provides a balance between a meaningful incentive (given that PSU awards only provide value to the recipient in the event that certain long-term performance objectives are met) and retention (given that RSU awards only vest and become payable based upon continued service over time). Service-based RSU awards offer more certainty in value delivery thereby driving executive retention while also providing incentive to build sustainable long-term value in the form of stock appreciation for the benefit of our stockholders. In addition, the Compensation Committee believes that the use of PSUs rather than options establishes a stronger connection between the compensation of these NEOs and the achievement of performance goals that are important for long-term stockholder value creation as well as company growth.

For fiscal 2023, after assessing their individual performance, our CEO recommended equity award amounts to the Compensation Committee for each of our executive officers, including each of these other NEOs, other than herself. The Compensation Committee reviewed our CEO’s recommendations and, after assessing each of the factors described above, determined the equity awards to be granted for each executive officer as set forth below. For our CEO, the independent members of our Board assessed her individual performance and the factors described above to determine the equity awards to be granted to her and granted her an RSU award and a PSU award as set forth below.

Consistent with the Compensation Committee’s and our Board’s intent to align executive interests with those of our stockholders:

In fiscal 2023, the Compensation Committee (or, in the case of our CEO, the independent members of our Board) granted each NEO equity awards in the following amounts (no stock options were granted in fiscal 2023):

The equity awards granted to our NEOs in fiscal 2023 are reported in the Fiscal 2023 Summary Compensation Table under “Executive Compensation” below. Additional information about these awards, including the number of shares of our common stock subject to each award and the award’s grant date fair value and applicable vesting schedules, is reported in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards For Fiscal 2023 Table under “Executive Compensation” below.

On June 30, 2021, Ms. Winter was granted a performance stock option to purchase 200,160 shares of our common stock with an exercise price of $4.52 (the “Performance Option”) in connection with her promotion to President, which was effective July 1, 2021. The Performance Option vests over a three-year period beginning July 1, 2021 (the “Winter Performance Period”), subject to achievement of rigorous revenue-based vesting conditions and Ms. Winter’s continued employment by the Company through each vesting date. The shares subject to the Performance Option are divided into three equal tranches (each, a “Grant Tranche”), one for each fiscal year during the Winter Performance Period. Each Grant Tranche will vest if our total revenue at the end of the applicable fiscal year to which such Grant Tranche relates is at least 5% more than our total revenue from the immediately preceding fiscal year (each, an “Annual Revenue Target”). Furthermore, if the Annual Revenue Target for a particular fiscal year within the Winter Performance Period is not achieved and the shares subject to the applicable Grant Tranche does not vest, the Performance Option allows for the vesting of such shares in a subsequent fiscal year within the Winter Performance Period if the Company sufficiently overachieves Annual Revenue Targets during the remainder of the Winter Performance Period to make up for any prior shortfall. Such Annual Revenue Targets directly link Ms. Winter’s pay to our performance and is designed to be achievable yet challenging and to only reward Ms. Winter for overperformance relative to our recent company performance.

The Compensation Committee determined that the Annual Revenue Target was met for fiscal 2023, and as a result 66,720 shares covered by the second Grant Tranche vested on September 13, 2023.

In November 2022, Mr. Chalke received a payment of $92,500 as the second installment of his sign-on bonus under the employment agreement he signed when he joined the Company in fiscal 2022.

Our Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines to help ensure that we are managed in the best long-term interests of our stockholders, to promote effective functioning of the Board and its committees and to provide a flexible framework within which our Board may conduct its oversight of our business. The Corporate Governance Guidelines require that our executive officers and non-employee members of our Board own shares of our common stock as follows:

Our executive officers and non-employee directors have five years from the date of election or appointment to attain such ownership levels. We expect each executive officer and non-employee director to retain at least 25% of the net shares of our common stock he or she receives pursuant to all equity awards granted by us (excluding shares sold to cover (i) the exercise price of any stock options and/or (ii) associated withholding and other taxes), until the foregoing ownership levels are achieved. As of the last day of fiscal 2023, all of our NEOs and all of our non-employee directors were in compliance with such stock ownership requirements or were on track to be in compliance within the appropriate timeframe.

The Company Bonus Plan, 2007 Incentive Award Plan, and the 2016 Equity Incentive Plan each include a compensation recovery (“clawback”) provision, which provides that, in the event we are required to restate our financial results or materially reduce publicly disclosed backlog figures, our Board will review the conduct of our executive officers in relation to the restatement. If it determines that an executive officer has engaged in misconduct, or otherwise violated our Code of Conduct and Ethics, and that such misconduct or violation contributed to the restatement or to the improper inclusion of a proposed system sale in publicly disclosed backlog, then our Board may, in its discretion, take appropriate action to remedy the misconduct or violation, including, without limitation, seeking reimbursement of any portion of any performance-based or incentive compensation paid or awarded to the executive officer that is greater than what would have been paid or awarded if calculated based on the restated financial results or materially reduced backlog figures, to the extent not prohibited by governing law. These provisions will be updated and revised consistent with any changes in applicable laws, including the adoption of rules implementing Section 954 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.

We maintain an insider trading policy that prohibits trading in shares of our common stock while in possession of material, non-public information, unless trading is in connection with a previously established Exchange Act Rule 10b5-1 plan, or if sold automatically by us on the date of vesting to cover and pay the withholding tax requirements in accordance with Company policy.

In addition, our insider trading policy prohibits all of our employees, including our executive officers, consultants and the non-employee members of our Board from engaging any speculative transactions in our securities, including purchasing on margin, holding Company securities in margin accounts, purchasing financial instruments (including prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars and exchange funds), engaging in short sales, engaging in transactions in put options, call options or other derivative securities, or engaging in any other forms of hedging transactions.

Our employees, including our executive officers, consultants and the non-employee members of our Board are also prohibited from pledging or using our securities as collateral for loans.

Historically, the Compensation Committee has granted stock options, RSU awards and/or performance-based equity awards (PSU awards or MSU awards) to our employees, including our executive officers, when they first join us. Typically, new hire stock options, RSU awards and performance-based equity awards are granted at the first meeting of the Compensation Committee in the month following an employee’s first day of employment.

Follow-on awards are considered as part of our fiscal review process. We do not seek to time the grant of stock options, RSU awards or performance-based equity awards to take advantage of information, either positive or negative, about the Company that has not been publicly disclosed.

We grant stock options with an exercise price that is equal to the fair market value of a share of our common stock on the date of grant. We do not have a policy of granting stock options with an exercise price that is less than the fair market value of our common stock. The exercise price for our stock options is based on the closing price per share of our common stock as reported on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on the date of grant.

Other than our tax-qualified Section 401(k) employee savings plan described in the following paragraph, we do not currently maintain, nor do we have plans to provide, pension arrangements, retirement plans or nonqualified deferred compensation plans or arrangements for our executive officers, including our NEOs.

We maintain a tax-qualified Section 401(k) employee savings plan that provides all regular employees with an opportunity to save for retirement on a tax-advantaged basis. Under this plan, participants may elect to defer a portion of their annual compensation on a pre-tax basis and have it contributed to the plan subject to applicable annual Internal Revenue Code limits. Pre-tax contributions are allocated to each participant’s individual account and are then invested in selected investment alternatives according to such participant’s directions. Typically, we match 50% of each participant’s contributions to the plan, up to a maximum contribution by a participant of six percent of his or her base salary per year. One hundred percent of our matching contributions made to the Section 401(k) employee savings plan on behalf of an employee vest on the first anniversary of such employee’s service. As a tax-qualified retirement plan, contributions to the plan and earnings on those contributions are not taxable to participants until distributed from the plan and all contributions are deductible by us when made.

We view this plan as serving two important objectives. First, it encourages our executive officers, including our NEOs, and other employees to commit to long-term service with us. Second, it enables them to save a portion of their annual compensation for their eventual retirement.

Given that the amounts set aside for retirement under the plan are largely drawn from participants’ annual compensation and our matching contribution is modest, the Compensation Committee does not consider plan participation when making compensation decisions for our executive officers, including our NEOs.

We provide health and welfare benefits to our executive officers, including our NEOs, on the same terms and conditions as all of our full-time, salaried employees. These benefits include group medical, life and disability insurance.

In circumstances where we are recruiting a candidate who would have to move to accept our job offer, we may agree to reimburse certain of such employee’s relocation expenses.

Generally, we do not provide perquisites or other personal benefits to our executive officers, including our NEOs. To the extent that any NEO was granted a perquisite or other personal benefit that is subject to disclosure, such perquisite or other personal benefit has been reported in the Fiscal 2023 Summary Compensation Table below.

Effective January 1, 2023, we entered into amended and restated employment agreements with each of our then-current executive officers, including Messrs. Pervaiz, Chalke, Chew and Hoge as well as Ms. Winter, to document the material terms and conditions of each executive officer’s employment, including his or her annual base salary and target cash incentive award opportunity. Each executive officer’s employment agreement has a three-year term (with automatic successive three-year term renewal unless we or the executive officer provides timely notice of non-renewal) and specifies the payments and benefits that each executive officer will receive upon a potential termination of his or her employment under certain circumstances, including in connection with a change in control of the Company.

The employment agreements with our executive officers also protect our interests in the event of a termination of employment by stipulating the rights and responsibilities of the parties and prohibiting these individuals from engaging in certain specific activities harmful to us, including disclosing our confidential information, soliciting our employees and engaging in certain competitive business activities.

These post-employment compensation arrangements were provided for the following reasons:

The Compensation Committee believes that these agreements serve several other important objectives. First, they provide a desired level of transparency, both within and outside the Company. They also assure our executive officers that their severance payments and benefits are based on a consistent framework that differentiates the level of payments and benefits between individuals based on their position and level of responsibility. In addition, this approach is easier for us to administer.

Generally, our executive officers, including our NEOs, are eligible for severance payments and benefits in the event of the termination of their employment by us without “cause” or by the executive officer for “good reason,” in each case, provided that the executive officer executes a general release of claims in favor of the Company. In addition, our executive officers, including our NEOs, are eligible for certain enhanced severance payments and benefits in the event such termination of employment without cause or resignation for good reason occurs within three months prior to or 24 months following a change in control of the Company (i.e., a “double-trigger” arrangement). Further, our executive officers, including our NEOs, are not entitled to a “gross-up” payment for excise taxes in connection with a change in control of the Company. We believe that the agreements offer payments and benefits that are generally comparable to the payments and benefits of similarly situated executives at the companies in our compensation peer group.

For additional information, see “—Executive Compensation—Potential Payments and Benefits Upon Termination or Change in Control” below.

Generally, Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code disallows a tax deduction to any publicly-held corporation for any remuneration in excess of $1 million paid in any taxable year to its chief executive officer, chief financial officer and certain other highly compensated current and former executive officers. For tax years

beginning before January 1, 2018, remuneration in excess of $1 million was exempt from this limit and, therefore, could be deducted if it qualified as “performance-based compensation” within the meaning of Section 162(m).

The exception from Section 162(m)’s deduction limit for performance-based compensation has been repealed, effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, such that compensation paid to our covered executive officers in excess of $1 million will not be deductible unless it qualifies for transition relief applicable to certain arrangements in place as of November 2, 2017 that has not been subsequently materially modified. The Compensation Committee seeks to operate our executive compensation program to maximize the deductibility of the remuneration paid to our NEOs to the extent that it believes that doing so is in our best interests. Consequently, in determining which compensation elements are to be paid to our executive officers, and how they are weighted, the Compensation Committee takes into account whether a particular form of compensation will be deductible under Section 162(m), but retains discretion to award compensation that is not deductible under Section 162(m) if it believes that doing so is in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders.

While we cannot predict how the $1 million deduction limit may impact our executive compensation program in future years, the Compensation Committee intends to maintain an approach to executive compensation that strongly links pay to performance. However, the Compensation Committee may, in its judgment, authorize and pay compensation that is not fully tax deductible when it believes that such compensation is in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders.

We follow ASC Topic 718 for our stock-based awards. ASC Topic 718 requires companies to measure the compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees and directors, including stock options, RSU awards and performance-based equity awards (PSUs and MSUs), based on the grant date “fair value” of these awards. This calculation is performed for accounting purposes and reported in the compensation tables below, even though our NEOs may never realize any value from their awards. ASC Topic 718 also requires companies to recognize the compensation cost of their stock-based compensation awards in their income statements over the period that an executive officer is required to render service in exchange for the option or other award.

For performance unit awards, stock-based compensation expense recognized may be adjusted over the performance period based on interim estimates of performance against their pre-established performance objectives.

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K and contained in this Proxy Statement with management. Based on such review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to our Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The foregoing Compensation Committee Report shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under these acts, except to the extent that we expressly incorporate it by reference into such filings.

The following table sets forth the compensation for each of fiscal years 2023, 2022 and 2021 paid to and earned by the following persons, who we refer to as our Named Executive Officers or (“NEOs”):

The following table sets forth information regarding awards granted under the Company Bonus Plan and equity awards granted under our 2016 Equity Incentive Plan or other stand-alone plan/agreement to each of our NEOs during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2023.

The following table sets forth the outstanding and exercisable and unexercisable stock options and other unvested stock awards held by our NEOs as of June 30, 2023. The market value for the stock awards was calculated by multiplying the number of shares of our common stock subject to each award by the closing market price per share of our common stock on June 30, 2023, the last trading day of the fiscal year.